ADS

Monday, April 6, 2009

Russia steps in to bail out sinking Project 15-A




To comprehend the size of a 6,800-tonne warship, one really needs to see it out of water. In Mazagon Dock Ltd, Mumbai (MDL), we stare awestruck at two such vessels being built side by side, towering hulks of steel that are being welded and hammered into frontline destroyers for the Indian Navy. Then we are shown their eventual form at a nearby slipway, where INS Kolkata, the first destroyer of Project 15-A, is being kitted out for its commissioning next year.MDL is fighting to deliver this Rs 11,000 crore project on time. Holding it back is a default by a Ukrainian shipyard in delivering the propellers that drive these warships and the shafting that delivers power from the engines to the propellers. After three years of waiting fruitlessly for the equipment to arrive from Ukraine, MDL placed the order with a Russian shipyard.Ukrainian shipbuilders, set up in the Black Sea by the erstwhile Soviet Union navy, have been an important source of components for Indian warships. Each of the three Project 15-A destroyers will be powered by four Zarya reversible gas turbines from Ukraine, which have already been delivered. But they can only be installed after Russia delivers the shafting.MDL Chairman, Vice Admiral HS Malhi told Business Standard, “The Ukrainian shipbuilding industry is a mature one, but we have this problem of non-delivery. The answer is only to increase the level of indigenisation, and to develop and cultivate our own vendor base. As long as we are dependent upon foreign vendors, late delivery will remain a risk.”Business Standard has already reported on 6th March 09 on the delay to India’s Project 17 stealth frigate, INS Shivalik, because General Electric (GE) failed to get permission from the US government to install its gas turbine engines on the warship.Russia is assisting Project 15-A not only with shafting and propellers, but also the know-how for pontoon-assisted launches. Conventionally, a ship is “launched” into water once its hull is completed, after which the superstructure — the upper decks and masts that together weigh several thousand tonne — is fitted on in deeper water. The shallow water near the slipways, where warships are built, cannot accommodate fully built warships, which require a deeper draught.The INS Kolkata, for example, was under 3,000 tonnes when it was launched into water just 4.5 metres deep. But the next two Project 15-A vessels will weigh over 4,000 tonnes at launch because they will have pontoons — steel compartments welded outside the deck — that will lift the ship in the water like inflatable armbands do to swimmers. The pontoons are removed once the ship reaches deeper water.Explains Commander HC Dhamija, project superintendent of Project 15-A, “This will provide added buoyancy, which will allow us to launch the ship into shallower water. There are a greater number of days when the tide provides us with 4.5 metres, so that makes planning a launch easier. If, for some reason, you miss the date with the highest tide, you are still left with some options.”Russia has also provided the warship-grade steel for Project 15-A. Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL) now makes warship-grade steel, but the manufacture of these destroyers began before SAIL production ramped up. SAIL’s current production is barely enough for the Indigenous Aircraft Carrier (IAC) being constructed at Cochin Shipyard Ltd, Kochi.The first Kolkata class destroyer is to be delivered in May 2010. The next two are scheduled for delivery at one year intervals, i.e. May 2011 and May 2012, respectively.



6 comments:

Russian steel. Lol. Everything is foreign about these ships. Indians need to relise they are falling behind, not catching up.

Type99, Indian production of warship class steel is being consumed by Air Defense Ship(ADS) though production is being ramped up. The ADS probably weighs more than Pakistan's entire surface fighting fleet. Take a good look at 6800t P15A to know what is a destroyer since Pakistan probably will never have one. You call F22 a frigate which compares to our corvettes or coast guard OPVs. Who needs to do the catching up?

Whose refering to Pakistan. Then again India and Pakistan like to be compared to each other. Lol, how sad, have you got the "I hate pakistan syndrome"? Them destroyer may look good on paper but will be delayed again and again. Just read your papers of the many delays. May look good aginst Pakistan but not against Chinese navy.

China has nothing to compare with a ship armed with 16 PJ-10 and 48 Barak 8. And dont even try to compare Barak 8 to HQ9, there is a generation of difference between Israeli and Chinese AESA and Seeker technology. By the way what "lol" stands for. I take it as an abuse when I see one.

LOL = laugh out loud. No offence intended.

Barack 8 if I am right is still under development. HQ 9 is in service. The Type 052C destroyer has 48 hq 9 missiles. This is in service. Chinese Navy has been pumping out various destroyers in last ten years. We cant compare what is on paper to whats in service. Most likely China will field a new missile or improved missile based on hq 9. China does not announce its programs.


AESA; China is behind but are making efforts to catch up. Think of it this way, India radars have been consistantly sidelined for a foreign product. Thus no incentive for DRDO to make one because they know military most likely go for better ones abroad.

Barack 8 or Barak MR for indian navy is more comparable to Chinese HQ-16 and future Barak-LR/NG will be comparable to HQ-9, but by then Chinese will be producing atleast HQ-9 comparable to S-300MPU-2 with ranges of around 200km+. Not to forget that Type 052C destroyer is already in service and Barak-8 is yet to be tested.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More